March 2009

George Owell 1984 Animation

by Ben Atlas on 03.28.2009.10:10pm · 1 comment

YouTube Preview Image

“In our world there will be no emotions except fear, rage, triumph, and self-abasement. Everything else we shall destroy – everything…. No one dares trust a wife or a child or a friend any longer. But in the future there will be no wives and no friends….

We shall abolish the orgasm. Our neurologists are at work upon it now. There will be no loyalty, except loyalty towards the Party. There will be no love, except the love of Big Brother. There will be no laughter, except the laugh of triumph over a defeated enemy. There will be no art, no literature, no science…. There will be no curiosity, no enjoyment of the process of life. All competing pleasures will be destroyed. But always – do not forget this, Winston – always there will be the intoxication of power, constantly increasing and constantly growing subtler. Always, at every moment, there will be the thrill of victory, the sensation of trampling on an enemy who is helpless…. If you want a picture of the future, imagine a boot stamping on a human face – forever. “

Ezra Merkin Emerges from Bernie Madoff’s Shadow

by Ben Atlas on 03.28.2009.7:43pm · 0 comments

Long and breathtakingly interesting article in the New York Magazine: The Monster Mensch by Steve Fishman. (What made Bernie Madoff, a man who helped revolutionize Wall Street and built a completely legal billion-dollar business, perpetrate the greatest fraud in history? And what led Ezra Merkin, born to immense privilege, to enable him?)

madoff090302_2_250
The article describes Bernie Madoff’s role in the breaking of the NY Stock exchange monopoly and building NASDAQ. If accurate than for sure Bernie Madoff’s influenced on the American Business far outweighs anything he could possible steal.

Ezra Merkin’s role becomes much clearer as he evidently raised enormous amounts for Bernie Madoff and introduced him to the NY Jewish rich and the Jewish philanthropy which is the same really.

There are some interesting details about the families.  I am unnerved by the revelation that Ezra Merkin was a major collector of Rothko paintings. Because of the detached style of the abstractions and because with the millions he spent on Rothko one could have started an art movement and/or fed hundreds (make it thousands) of starving artists in the process. May be that’s why Rothko cut his veins and bled on his final canvas, he probably had a vision of Ezra Merkin hanging the painting in the Park Ave. living room.

The article is very well written although it is obviously completely borrowed from published and online sources. Some of the sources are readily recognized. And unfortunately (at least in the online version) there is regrettable lack of proper links and attributions. I am certain that they read what I blogged about this (two paragraphs in the article). The main weakness of this remarkable piece, is that it was written virtually without any first hand contacts or conversations.

Here is interesting quote that sheds light on the massive role Ezra Merkin played in this drama.

“And so Ezra took Bernard L. Madoff Investment Securities places Bernie couldn’t have dreamed of going by himself. The list of people and institutions that Ezra Merkin put with Bernie Madoff is a kind of Jewish social register. There was Mort Zuckerman, the media and real-estate mogul, and Ira Rennert, chairman of Fifth Avenue Synagogue and owner of a 68-acre oceanfront Hamptons estate. Over 30 charities invested with Ezra, many of them with a Jewish affiliation. Ramaz was in, as was Yeshiva. Not every investor says they knew that Ezra’s fund Ascot was fully invested with Madoff, an assertion that will be at issue in forthcoming lawsuits. Ezra maintains that, at the very least, he let people know that he might invest with other managers. And in some instances, he claims he was more direct. In the case of Yeshiva, with perhaps the largest endowment of any nonprofit he managed, he did report a relationship with Bernie, though it appears not to have been the real one.

Ezra had served as chairman of Yeshiva’s investment committee since about 1994. Not long after that, the committee directed $14.5 million of Yeshiva’s endowment to Ascot, which Ezra passed along to Madoff, collecting his usual fee, initially one percent and later 1.5 percent, standard for all of Yeshiva’s money managers.”

There is also a second article with a more personal color on Mishpocha Madoff: A Family Friend of Bernie Madoff Speaks Out — New York Magazine.

Some completing quotes from David Eaves in Newspapers’ decline is a sign of democracy’s health, not a symptom of its death | eaves.ca: Especially interesting the comparison of Boomers to the generation Y:

“Newspapers, in contrast, are many things, but they are not democratic. They are hierarchical authoritarian structures designed to control and shape information. This is not to say they don’t provide a societal benefit—their content contributes to the public discourse. However, how is having a few major media outlets deciding “what is news” democratic, or even good for democracy? The newspaper model isn’t about expanding free speech; it is about limiting it to force readers to listen to what the editor prescribes. When is the last time you had an opinion piece or letter published in a newspaper? There are many more voices in America that deserve to be heard aside from Ivy League educated editors and journalists.

The “necessary for democracy” argument also assumes that readers are less civically engaged if they digest their news online. How absurd. Gen Y is likely far more knowledgeable about their world than Boomers were. The problem is that Boomers appeared more knowledgeable to one another because they all knew the same things. The limited array of media meant people were generally civically minded about the same things and evaluated one another based on how much of the same media they’d seen. The diversity available in today’s media—facilitated greatly by the internet—means it is hard to evaluate someone’s civic mindedness because they may be deeply knowledgeable and engaged in a set of issues you are completely unfamiliar with. Diversity of content and access to it, made possible by the internet, has strengthened our civic engagement.”

Via Genetic Future : The decline of inbreeding, written in our genes:

The graph shows a steady decline in estimated inbreeding levels across the studied time span, consistent with an increased tendency for individuals to find mates far from the place they were born - something made a lot easier by mechanised transport and increased urbanisation, and something that (barring civilisational catastrophe) seems set to continue for the foreseeable future. (via Genetic Future : The decline of inbreeding, written in our genes.)

"The graph shows a steady decline in estimated inbreeding levels across the studied time span, consistent with an increased tendency for individuals to find mates far from the place they were born - something made a lot easier by mechanised transport and increased urbanisation, and something that (barring civilisational catastrophe) seems set to continue for the foreseeable future."

How do people AKA scientists get paid to produce studies about subjects self evident to a child? That’s why they call it a melting pot stupid! They should have tested Brazil where assimilation is/was a government policy, or even the genetically stable Russia where the post industrial, post revolutionary trend graph would look much similar. The emphasis on America is only in reference to the sample, but certainly is a byproduct of the global industrial revolution. Truly interesting subject is not the increase itself but the historic acceleration. For example it is interesting to take a two hundred thousand year span and measure the assimilation hot spots where the commingling suddenly shot up. That study would readily trace the imperial conquests.

Razib claims in his post Gene Expression: Decline in inbreeding over time that cousin marriages where the Protestant innovation prohibited by the Catholic church (true?). He writes:

“In Europe as a whole the rate of consanguinity has not changed monotonically over the past 1,000 years. After the Reformation cousin marriage was sanctioned in many Protestant nations whereas before the Catholic Church had strictly proscribed it. The main caveat to this is that religious regulation of marriage was a much greater concern for elites than it was for common people, as the latter often entered into common law relationships which were never formally solemnized.”

What was the Anglican and its many American offshoots policy in regards to the cousin marriages? Does this also explain all the inbreeding jokes about the American South?

Mattias Inks

by Ben Atlas on 03.24.2009.8:44pm · 0 comments

merchant-navy
Beautiful watercolors from Sweden: Mattias Inks.

The Stone of Cádiz by Mick Stern

by Ben Atlas on 03.23.2009.8:52pm · 0 comments

This small white stone was found
on the last day of the year
near the fortress in the harbor of Cádiz
When I picked it up
it was warm from the sun
I tapped the sand off,
put it in my pocket

and brought it here
Look
open your hand
close your fingers over it
It says nothing, feels nothing, hears nothing
Have faith in it

Mick’s Site.

Tel Aviv Graffiti No. 1

by Ben Atlas on 03.22.2009.5:52pm · 0 comments

2563_69663099046_586869046_2264813_7548900_nThe stencil says: “I want to be free”. Photo by Yasha Harari.

Photo-Graphic Sarcasm by Petr Krejčí

by Ben Atlas on 03.21.2009.6:16pm · 0 comments

Interesting photographs from London based Petr Krejčí. This one is part of the series poking fun at Asian food:
914931236293765

Menu Board by Petr Krejčí.

Advice from Hugh MacLeod – Ignore everybody

by Ben Atlas on 03.21.2009.5:39pm · 0 comments

zzzzazzdggg49

I often speak and write about the puzzlement of advice. It is difficult to give and receive advice. Most of advice we receive from friends and strangest is either clueless or irresponsible. In fact closer and more trusting we are to people, more likely it is that we will be misled by a bad advice from them. A trusting guidance from friends usually results in a lasting damage. In this light with particular interest I read the sketch of the of the forthcoming book by Hugh MacLeod Ignore everybody:

“The more original your idea is, the less good advice other people will be able to give you. When I first started with the cartoon-on-back-of-bizcard format, people thought I was nuts. Why wasn’t I trying to do something more easy for markets to digest i.e. cutey-pie greeting cards or whatever? You don’t know if your idea is any good the moment it’s created. Neither does anyone else. The most you can hope for is a strong gut feeling that it is. And trusting your feelings is not as easy as the optimists say it is. There’s a reason why feelings scare us.

And asking close friends never works quite as well as you hope, either. It’s not that they deliberately want to be unhelpful. It’s just they don’t know your world one millionth as well as you know your world, no matter how hard they try, no matter how hard you try to explain.

Plus a big idea will change you. Your friends may love you, but they don’t want you to change. If you change, then their dynamic with you also changes. They like things the way they are, that’s how they love you- the way you are, not the way you may become.

Ergo, they have no incentive to see you change. And they will be resistant to anything that catalyzes it. That’s human nature. And you would do the same, if the shoe was on the other foot.

With business colleagues it’s even worse. They’re used to dealing with you in a certain way. They’re used to having a certain level of control over the relationship. And they want whatever makes them more prosperous. Sure, they might prefer it if you prosper as well, but that’s not their top priority.

If your idea is so good that it changes your dynamic enough to where you need them less, or God forbid, THE MARKET needs them less, then they’re going to resist your idea every chance they can.

Again, that’s human nature.

GOOD IDEAS ALTER THE POWER BALANCE IN RELATIONSHIPS, THAT IS WHY GOOD IDEAS ARE ALWAYS INITIALLY RESISTED.

Good ideas come with a heavy burden. Which is why so few people have them. So few people can handle it.”

zzzbambam34

Doug Bowman jumps Google ship (for Twitter?)

by Ben Atlas on 03.21.2009.4:59pm · 0 comments

The remarkable designer Doug Bowman just quit Google. He published Part One explanation on his blog: Goodbye Google | stopdesign. Doug writes:

“When I joined Google as its first visual designer, the company was already seven years old. Seven years is a long time to run a company without a classically trained designer. Google had plenty of designers on staff then, but most of them had backgrounds in CS or HCI. And none of them were in high-up, respected leadership positions. Without a person at (or near) the helm who thoroughly understands the principles and elements of Design, a company eventually runs out of reasons for design decisions. With every new design decision, critics cry foul. Without conviction, doubt creeps in. Instincts fail. “Is this the right move?” When a company is filled with engineers, it turns to engineering to solve problems. Reduce each decision to a simple logic problem. Remove all subjectivity and just look at the data. Data in your favor? Ok, launch it. Data shows negative effects? Back to the drawing board. And that data eventually becomes a crutch for every decision, paralyzing the company and preventing it from making any daring design decisions.”

Silicon Alley Insider claims Doug is going to Twitter. This makes senses because Evan Williams the current CEO of Twitter has launched Blogger and sold it to Google. Doug Bowman was responsible (before his days at Google) for design of some of the most beautiful blogger templates, including the template I used for my original blog.

The Departed Leibl Lionel Ziprin

by Ben Atlas on 03.21.2009.1:02pm · 1 comment

The New York Times published wonderful and touching obituary of Leibush Ziprin. Lionel Ziprin, Poet and Mystic of the Lower East Side, Dies at 84 – Obituary (Obit) – NYTimes.com.

Wikipedia: Lionel Ziprin.
NPR Music: A Grandson’s Quest to Preserve His Jewish Heritage.

Romeo and Juliet – The Killers

by Ben Atlas on 03.20.2009.7:55pm · 1 comment

The Killers cover the Dire Straits song.
YouTube Preview Image

A lovestruck Romeo, sings the streets a serenade
Laying everybody low with a love song that he made
Finds a streetlight, steps out of the shade
Says something like, “You and me, babe, how about it?”

Juliet says, “Hey, it’s Romeo, you nearly gave me a heart attack”
He’s underneath the window, she’s singing
“Hey, la, my boyfriend’s back
You shouldn’t come around here, singing up people like that
Anyway, what you gonna do about it?”

Juliet, the dice was loaded from the start
And I bet, that you exploded in my heart
And I forget, I forget.. the movie song
When you gonna realize, it was just that the time was wrong, Juliet?

Come up on different streets, they both were streets of shame
Both dirty, both mean, yes and the dream was just the same
And I dream your dream for you and now your dream is real
How can you look at me, as if I was just another one of your deals?

Well, you can fall for chains of silver, you can fall for chains of gold
You can fall for pretty strangers and the promises they hold
You promised me everything, you promised me thick and thin, yeah
Now you just say, “Oh, Romeo, yeah, you know
I used to have a scene with him”

Juliet, when we made love, you used to cry
I said, “I love you like the stars above, I love you ’till I die”
And there’s a place for us, you know the movie song
When you gonna realize, it was just that the time was wrong, Juliet?

I can’t do the talk, like the talk on the TV
And I can’t do a love song, like the way it’s meant to be
I can’t do everything, but I’d do anything for you
I can’t do anything except be in love with you

And all I do is miss you and the way we used to be
All I do is keep the beat, and the bad company
And all I do is kiss you, through the bars of a Rhyme
Juliet, I’d do the stars with you any time

Juliet, when we made love, you used to cry
I said, “I love you like the stars above, I’ll love you ’till I die”
There’s a place for us, you know the movie song
When you gonna realize, it was just that the time was wrong, Juliet?

A lovestruck Romeo, sings the streets of serenade
Laying everybody low with a love song that he made
Find a convenient streetlight, and steps out of the shade
He says something like, “You and me, babe -how about it?”