Dr. Wilhelm Stekel (c. 1920s)
“The patient found boundless relief in being able at last to communicate his secret thoughts unconstrainedly. He did not know a soul to whom he could speak about these things. His glance was freer, his manner unconstrained. The art of psycho-therapy consists not only in releasing repressions but also in revealing how human it all is.” – Dr. Wilhelm Stekel
The Wilhelm Stekel’s case of a Rabbi described in the paper published by Maya Balakirsky Katz who identified the Rabbi as Sholom Dovber Schneersohn (שלום דובער שניאורסאהן), AKA the Rashab. This synopsis of the psychoanalytic sessions is documented by Dr. Wilhelm Stekel’s in his book Conditions of Nervous Anxiety and their Treatment. The book was originally published by Urban and Schwarzenberg in 1908. Dr. Wilhelm Stekel wrote in his autobiography that the memorable client was referred to him by Dr. Sigmund Freud. The case is described in the second part of this book The Phobias, in the chapter Vocational Neurosis (ten tightly printed pages starting from page 211 in the Routledge edition):
This is the full text of the chapter Vocational Neurosis in pdf, please read before you skip to the comments here.
- The age of marriage is 18 while the Rashab married when he was 14. The ten pages about the Rabbi is a shorthand, multiple visits condensed. As Wilhelm Stekel wrote: “Let me be spared the description of the toilsome roundabout ways by which I arrived at my results. The conversations at our sittings would fill volumes“. Why distract the reader with the freakish Jewish customs? It might require an unnecessary for the flow of the anonymous case, explanation, perhaps even apologetics, it will make the Rabbi appear as a barbarian to the enlightened German speaking audience. Especially in the atmosphere when Stekel was clearly cognizant of the antisemitism, etc. All he wanted to say was that his patient married young, 18 will do. It’s interesting that the “Rabbi’s chapter” is titled Vocational Neurosis and the chapter immediately following it is Neurosis of a Priest (same in the original German?).
- The comment at the end about the Rabbi sending his “daughter” five years after the case (that would be 1908 when the book was published). As I already wrote, while in Vienna the Rashab cared for two orphans as he would care for his own daughters. The Rayatz describes there that his father married them off to a perfect strangers, literally found on the street. If two orphaned sisters are married to perfect strangers shouldn’t you expect that in exactly five years at least one would be in need of some therapy or have a crisis? Perhaps Rashab sent the woman to Dr. Stekel writing she is “like a daughter to me” and that became I was “treating his daughter” remark, especially because the Rashab likely paid for the treatment.
- Who could it be besides the Rashab? Let ‘s see the Rabbi was misbonnen be shem havaya, we now eliminated all the snags who never think about God, just about his alleged laws. Actually we can stop right here, but if you insist… There might be some Chernobeler-Cherkasser-Schneerson mutt like the Uncle Professor Psychiatrist Dr. Fishel Schneerson or some rouge Twersky like Nochum Shpikover. But who would have the sophisticated idea to see a shrink in 1903!!? Whomever this Rabbi was he didn’t go to some general practitioner in Berdichev, he sought out the top, experimental at the time, specialist before even the doctors heard of the psychoanalysis, in fact as Stekel wrote it was one of the first seminal cases. The geographically close Ruzhiner einiklach are just too materialistically remote to see a psychiatrist. The Galizinaner Rebbes, even the Tzanzer dynasty are your garden variety Neanderthals, who else, the Romanian savages? Even Freud himself wouldn’t be able to handle the perversions of that bunch. In other words please come up with another Chassidic Rebbe with a documented trip to Vienna in 1903 (or before 1908 when the book was published), who was exactly 42 years old then, who was involved in the known to his chassidim quarrel with his older brother about the books and who used to mediate about the symbolic meaning (yihudim) of God’s name, gleamed from his grandfather’s manuscript. Moreover find a Rebbe who did as Stekel writes “a great deal of mental work” and “all kinds of people used to come to him from far and wide to ask his counsel in difficult matters”.
- Even I know that the Rashab traveled widely, could this itinerary mentioned by Dr. Stekel be confirmed: “He sought in vain a remedy for his affliction in Berlin, Vienna, and Paris. He went to Scheveningen [the resort town next to Hague], Homburg, Wiesbaden, Gainfarn, etc. He had stayed some months in Worishofen.”
Sholom Dovber Schneersohn, The Rashab. Rostov, 1920
There is something else that I find interesting, unlike the contemporary vile sensationalist headline seekers, the molestation is downplayed or at least described similarly to other “sexual experiences”. Holding a girls hand left as much impression on the Rabbi as being molested by an older man as a child (btw, I read in Stekel’s autobiography that he considered every human a bisexual by nature).
Noteworthy that the cathartic part of the psychoanalysis was not the revelation about the molestation or the fantasies but the untangling of the associations and images in the shem havaya: “He halted always at the “Adonai,” because this word reminded him not only of his sinful desires but of his inhibitions. For the God of the Jews is a stern, merciless, punishing God.”
Finally the psychoanalysis was in 1903 and just in three years later was the creative eruption known as the Samech Vov. There is no doubt that Dr. Wilhelm Stekel unknowingly released the creative imagination.
- Further Reading:
- Dr. Wilhelm Stekel, a 42-year-old Rabbiner and the Rashab
- Wilhelm Stekel and the Rashab’s “daughter”
- The Rabbiner in Wilhelm Stekel’s Autobiography
{ 5 comments… read them below or add one }
“The geographically close Ruzhiner einiklach are just too materialistically remote to see a psychiatrist.” HaHaHa, as a Ruzhiner einikel that really cracked me up…. needless to say – you’re WAY off the mark, champ, buying into stereotypes that never had anything to do with reality. You won’t find another chasidic family with more diverse or creative types. And this was true in 1900 as well, ask David Assaf…
My great uncle, one of the prominent Beit Ruzhin rebbes of the previous generation, told about his meeting with the Zanzer rebbe. The Zanzer told him “Our forefathers were entangled in a deep conflict, but now B”H there’s shalom between us”, and my uncle retorted: “Sure, when we had money and you didn’t, there was war; today when you have money and we don’t, there’s shalom”. That’s the story, champ, take it and run…
I did actually read David Assaf’s book about the Ruzhiner (and the original Gotlober autobiography where some of the Assaf’s facts are sourced) and this actually informed my disregard for the family. Although I am in contact with Prof. Assaf so I am going to ask him if there is anything good about the dynasty that he forgot to put into his monumental study. But I am an open minded person and I don’t prejudge any human being. Alas, the idiotic, nothing to do with the post family tale, you left as this comment is not too encouraging.
“Alas, the idiotic, nothing to do with the post family tale, you left as this comment is not too encouraging.” WTF? Umm, please brush up on your English, sir… It ain’t a good day to be slipping into Russian grammar, you may find the FBI at yer back…
Ya ain’t up to speed, champ! I wasn’t refering to Assaf’s book on the Ruzhiner (his PhD thesis), which is quite interesting but focuses on my great-great-great granddaddy R’ Israel, and barely deals with the offspring. I referred to his “Ne’echaz Basvach” (now in English as “Untold Tales of the Hasidim”). See e.g. the last two chapter. And it’s really exciting that you are in contact with Assaf! Can I shake your hand, champ?
This post is about Rashab, a Ruzhiner is not the one described by Stekel. We should agree on that.
I read the book in Hebrew and now have the English translation. You refer to the chapter 6 about Menachem Nochum of Itscan. I will take a closer look.
OK Indeed Assaf talks about Menachem Nohum Friedman in glowing terms there. But he was born in 1879, that’s Rayatz’s generation (born in 1880). Menachem Nohum Friedman never became a Rebbe. In addition, the other Friedmans Assaf describes are even younger . In other words nothing to do with some 42-eyar-old Rabbiner Stekel saw in 1903-08. And all the Chortkov, Sadigura, Boyan, Husyatin Friedmans who made their way to Vienna escaping the WWI, that was in 1914, 7 years after the book was published.
And naturally the bright and interesting Menachem Nohum Friedman was the Ruzhiner exception, not the rule.