Michelangelo, The Fall of Phaeton. c. 1533, Royal Library, Windsor
When Michelangelo was in his late fifties he fell in love with a noble teenager Tommaso de’ Cavalieri. They continued to be close friends for 30 years till Michelangelo died. Michelangelo wrote series of poems and most importantly remarkable allegorical drawings as a gift to Tommaso. There is an exhibition of these drawings in the Courtland gallery in London. The one above is one the drawings Michelangelo gave as gift to his muse (video). Michelangelo was rather a prankster, draw an imaginary diagonal lines and see what was the absolute center of the composition. The falling horses are even more impressive than Leonardo’s horses in the Battle of Anghiari. ►►►read more
Landstraße, Quint Buchholz
Ennio comments to Fyodor Dostoyevsky versus the Grand Inquisitor in Seville:
“People are wrong when they say that Dostoevsky was a Great Writer, …he was a Genius-Lobotomist… He never urges you to come, you always go visit him by your own will. You sit down on the chair, he looks into your eyes with a smile that makes you feel some cold beneath your stomach. Then he slowly gets his surgery tools, and starts drilling your cranial bone. Then he opens your head and with fast moving arms makes a mix of your gray substance and fresh oxygen that comes in through the opened window. After that he fixes your scalping bone back and leaves your alone within your pathetic existence. This is Dostoevsky, he never explains and never finish his work, letting you to do this by yourself. There are no Raskolnikoffs, no Mishkins and no Karamazovs at all, there are only the different forms of you – the reader. And you are the one to decide, nobody will decide for you. Just take a walk, feel the life running through your hands and finish that damn book! Then go home and kiss whoever you love – wife, daughter, mom… …and stay away from Dostoevsky, because if you want to be part of society – Dostoevsky is not for you, otherwise you will became an anxious exiled being.
P.S. I do thank Dostoevsky for his courage.
P.P.S. As Tolstoy said: “You can love or you can hate Dostoevsky. Whatever your feelings are, you should read him, you MUST!… at least once in a lifetime…”
Off Dostoyevsky topic: I have been looking today at the work of Quint Buchholz, I go back to it like to a favorite vacation spot. No all but most of the sidebar rotating images are his art. Quint wrote to me he was OK with that. I have been collecting postcards of his art for years, without even knowing it was the same artist. And suddenly I realized that there is a direct line from the German romantic Caspar David Driedrich to Quint Buchholz. The Werner Herzog shtick of looking through a back of person to a mystical landscape. In fact I been nursing a post about Caspar David Driedrich on this very subject. There is a tremendous revival and interest in the art of Caspar David Friedrich. The Lobotomists Union…
John Frederick Lewis, Two horses pulling a plough, viewed from the back, c. 1820
We can’t define an intellectual by the volume of his database. Not even by his or her ability to reason. Alain de Botton writes that “a wealthy family in England in 1250 might have had three books in its possession: a Bible, a collection of prayers and a life of the saints”. They are not less intelligent than a college graduate in humanities after reading a thousand books. So intelligence is not a familiarity with the contemporary European philosophy, comparative fluency or ability to memorize. Intelligence is curiosity. This curiosity in turn fuels the exploration of a subject or an object.
I meet many people who have an enormous mental database covering a vast filed of knowledge. Yet they became jaded and lost their curiosity. It’s hard to describe these people as “intelligent”.
There are the current laments about the lack of intellectuals among the modern orthodox here and here (and not even an expectation about the other streams). This is unfair to people brought up or converted to the dogmatic culture. You can’t hold people responsible for the lack of curiosity if they are indoctrinated into a system that presumes and postulates more answers than questions. Centuries of breeding out the curious and curiosity as an undesirable trait are finally paying off.
Images licensed courtesy of Picture Library of the Royal Academy of Arts
Lewis family, Adam and Eve , 19th C.
Audio clip: Adobe Flash Player (version 9 or above) is required to play this audio clip. Download the latest version here. You also need to have JavaScript enabled in your browser.
Images licensed courtesy of Picture Library of the Royal Academy of Arts
John Frederick Lewis, A sleeping child
Audio clip: Adobe Flash Player (version 9 or above) is required to play this audio clip. Download the latest version here. You also need to have JavaScript enabled in your browser.
Images licensed courtesy of Picture Library of the Royal Academy of Arts
Mendel Schneerson
David Levine, perhaps the greatest American cultural caricaturist passed away in December. I have a special affinity for this art because my relative Joseph Igin was the Russian counterpart of David Levine. The new York Review of books published the entire archive of David Levin. Take a look at this Russian Writers caricatures, simply superb. Especially interesting are the different takes on the same people, you can see that these were not just semblance portraits but tour de force psychological descriptions, infections of the dominant personality notes. David Levine never seen this photo, yet he captured the Lubavitcher exactly, genius!

What used to be the great cafeteria and now the great Greek Hall at the Met on Sunday.
On a Tel Aviv bench, photo by Max Reider
The Internet culture is in crisis. Jewish blogs are stuck. A dignified livelihood is a challenge. Why? In one sentence, when a culture becomes derivative, it mines and depletes its own legacy. I started thinking about this topic when I read this paragraph in Jaron Lanier’s new book:
“It is astonishing how much of the chatter online is driven by fan responses to expression that was originally created within the sphere of old media and that is now being destroyed by the net. Comments about TV shows, major movies, commercial music releases, and video games must be responsible for almost as much bit traffic as porn. There is certainly nothing wrong with that, but since the web is killing the old media, we face a situation in which culture is effectively eating its own seed stock.”
Marshall McLuhan declared that “medium is the message”. What he meant was that a new form of expression, i.e. alphabet, writing, print, TV, etc., changes our brain wiring, tastes and values so radically that medium itself is the central cultural event. Inevitably at a dawn of every novel form of expression, a new medium is awkwardly used to reprocess the old, the bleak task comparable to translating poetry into a foreign language. This is the DJ stage where the Internet finds itself at the current moment. The old tunes are remixed, republished, relinked to a new beat, literally and figuratively no new music is created. Occasionally a new app is written for the legacy proprietary code instead of a new OS.
On to the Jews cursed with the satirical task of amplifying a culture. Every potential convert to Judaism needs to be aware of these axioms:
- Marshall McLuhan spoke about the “rear view mirror” phenomena or the propensity of any culture to live in a utopia about its past. Jews amplify this tendency in the worst possible way. Most traditional Jewish communities are consumed with intense utopia and the deliberate subterfuge of history.
- A Rabbi is a DJ, never singing in its own voice and forever spinning someone else’s tracks. There is a derivative throwback tendency in every culture but again amplified by the Jews. The tribe castigated to the two thousand years of the survivalist epic. With the rare exceptions (i.e. kabbalah) the innovation is shut down, conformism is bred and encouraged. People who can’t contain or control their creative impulses are eventually expelled from the traditional Jewish communities.
- Every group on the face of the earth is defined by what this group is not. Jaron Lanier calls this the “mob switch”. Once again this is most sensitive component of the traditional Jewish culture. Although the potential converts are not specifically instructed about the importance of the boundary defining hate, eventually to successfully integrate in the communities they would have to internalize the intense feeling of hatred towards other Jewish groups and denominations, towards the declared heretics, goyim, real and imaginary antisemites, etc.
Now let’s compare the three “Jewish problems” to the Internet. The Internet is definitely not a utopian vision of the past. There is strong revolutionary current, especially in the communal rhetoric of the Open Source movement and the Web 2.0 social. Alas, after a decade, a new server side oligarchy emerged to control the scalable bits. Instead of empowering creativity, no longer under a centralized command, there is a deliberate and impoverishing push for the “free”, the collapse of the copyright boundaries, devaluation of the original unpaid authorship under the assault the ad supported aggregators. The DJ culture is absolutely the internet as we know it today. The disastrous anonymous comments culture and the combustible flame wars take the group/mob hate to the unprecedented levels on the Internet.
And what about the Wall St.? The financial services industry dominated by the derivative contracts became the most important part of the American GDP. There is an easy analogy to the Internet (or any derivatives dominated culture). People often complain that the stocks are the trading instruments removed from the real value of a company. An options contract or a credit default swap contract is like a tweet about a comment on a blog post that links to a different newspaper web site. Derivatives are comments removed from a productive culture, they don’t innovate, don’t create value and eventually pop. To slap a Dell label on a product engineered and fabricated in China is like linking to someone else’s content on a popular web site. Our religions, our ability to make a living and our “internet economy”, the trifecta, is overrun by the derivative thinking. We can no longer extract value from comments about the dried up wells and we can no longer destroy the remaining functioning artisan wells. We can no longer condemn people to the indignity of being replaced by the machines or the outsourced slaves. We can’t DJ, quote, link, mashup or re-aggregate our way from this crisis. You can quote me on that.
Audio clip: Adobe Flash Player (version 9 or above) is required to play this audio clip. Download the latest version here. You also need to have JavaScript enabled in your browser.
Sir George Clausen, 'Night', ca. 1904
Audio clip: Adobe Flash Player (version 9 or above) is required to play this audio clip. Download the latest version here. You also need to have JavaScript enabled in your browser.
The image licensed courtesy of Picture Library of the Royal Academy of Arts
Sir John Gilbert, Vanbrugh Castle by night, December 1863
Audio clip: Adobe Flash Player (version 9 or above) is required to play this audio clip. Download the latest version here. You also need to have JavaScript enabled in your browser.
The art licensed courtesy of Picture Library of the Royal Academy of Arts